3 builders who never spoke to each other · contested
Ship the version that embarrasses you
Put the first release in front of strangers while it still looks unfinished, because the only judgement that counts comes from people who did not build it. Six builders here describe shipping something they were uncomfortable showing and finding that buyers paid anyway once the core value was real. Cory Zue released about five per cent of his eventual vision and Victoria Duben showed a build she found physically uncomfortable to demo.
Where this splits
Most members argue for releasing something visibly unfinished, while Jason Cohen holds that a first version should be small, complete and pleasant rather than a broken fragment of something bigger.
8 claims against 1
Arvid Kahl · Cory Zue · Jason Cohen · Justin Jackson · Justin Welsh · Luke Thomas
Ship it rough and let strangers judge
- 01Cut the scope of a first public version brutally and accept that it will embarrass you, because the alternative is months of private fiddling.
- 02Stop refining a product you are enjoying building and put the good-enough version out, because deciding whether it is wanted is not your call to make privately.
Ship something small, complete and pleasant to use
Ship something simple, lovable and complete instead of a minimum viable product: small enough to build fast, good enough that using it is a pleasure, and finished enough to do the whole job.
- 03Ship at roughly 80% of what you pictured rather than tuning towards a launch date that keeps moving.
- 04Ship a product with default interface components if it already solves the problem, and leave the polish for a later stage.
- 05An ugly product still sells if the value is there. Do not hold the launch for the interface.
What it returned
- 5%
Zue shipped a V1 of his secret project representing about 5% of his eventual vision and thought the release was poor, but shipped it anyway.
- 80%
Welsh's own newsletter went out at about 80% ready because he could see himself procrastinating out of starting altogether, and it has been refined repeatedly across the two years since.
Zue caught himself able to keep polishing his life timeline app for another week and named building in a vacuum for himself the cardinal sin of product building, then launched it rough.
The founder describes the early Friday interface as terrible and says customers paid anyway because they got enough value.
Sources
- How do I build something people want?Justin Jackson · justinjackson.ca · Finally, tell people about it! · undated
- You don't learn until you shipJustin Jackson · justinjackson.ca · You don't learn until you ship · undated
- Why We Often Sabotage OurselvesJustin Welsh · justinwelsh.me · Self-Sabotage Tactic #2: Chasing Perfection · 2023-11-18
- The roadmap to Product/Market Fit (PMF)… maybeJason Cohen · longform.asmartbear.com · WP Engine followed the roadmap and became a unicorn · 2023-12-24 · dissenting
- Being Imperfect in Public – The Bootstrapped FounderArvid Kahl · thebootstrappedfounder.com · 2022-02-03
- Your Life in WeeksCory Zue · coryzue.com · Your Life in Weeks · 2025-02-20
- My New Secret LifeCory Zue · coryzue.com · Ship the first iteration of my new secret thing (Project Griffin) · 2021-11-01
- Friday - From side project to raising $450kLuke Thomas · failory.com · How did you build Friday? · undated
the second source
Three plays a week, for the phase you are in
No roundup of links, no news. Three tactics more than one builder arrived at separately, with the numbers each one returned and the disagreements left in.
More in product
- Give away a tool that pulls its own audience7 unconnected
- Take many small shots instead of one big bet6 unconnected · contested
- Get it into real hands, or shape it first6 unconnected · contested
- Cap the hours and let the ceiling design the business6 unconnected · contested
- Set the bar for writing code deliberately high6 unconnected
- Buy nothing until there is revenue6 unconnected