2 builders who never spoke to each other · contested
Make the page usable fast, not just painted fast
The marketing scripts you bolted on are probably costing you rankings: chat, analytics and heatmap tools pushed one site to nearly nine seconds before it became usable while it looked instant. Render without them and inject them once the visitor has scrolled. Whether any of this is worth your time at small scale is disputed.
Where this splits
Harry Dry documents a speed fix no human visitor would notice tripling clicks and impressions, while Eli Schwartz says technical work on a small site does not return what you put into it.
5 claims against 1
Harry Dry
Cut time to interactive, the crawler notices
- 01Assume the marketing tools you bolted on are costing you rankings: third-party chat, analytics and heatmap scripts hold up interaction even when the page looks instant.
- 02Audit your site's speed score in Chrome DevTools and look at the six component metrics separately, since the score is a weighted composite rather than one number.
Technical work on a small site rarely pays
Do not pour effort into technical SEO on a small site. The returns are not there at that size.
- 03Expect a fix that no human visitor would notice to still move your rankings, because the crawler measures what the eye does not.
- 04Optimise for how quickly the page becomes usable rather than how quickly it appears, because the interactivity metric carries far more weight than the paint metrics.
- 05Render the page with none of the heavy third-party scripts present, and only inject them once the visitor has scrolled and a further second has elapsed.
What it returned
- 8.8
ToDesktop's content took 8.8 seconds to become usable, with Intercom for chat, Segment for data and Hotjar for heatmaps as the causes.
- 8.8
ToDesktop's founder implemented this in a short snippet, cutting time-to-interactive from 8.8 seconds to 0.9 while the paint figures stayed identical.
The weights for each metric are published in Chrome's own GitHub repository.
Following the June 14th change, organic clicks and impressions nearly tripled and the site moved from 25th to 11th on its main target term - correlation the author is careful not to call proof.
Sources
- Marketing tools are damaging your SEO. And how to fix it.Harry Dry · Marketing Examples · ToDesktop · undated
- Rethinking SEO in the age of AI | Eli Schwartz (SEO advisor, author)Eli Schwartz · lennysnewsletter.com · 2024-09-19 · dissenting
the second source
Three plays a week, for the phase you are in
No roundup of links, no news. Three tactics more than one builder arrived at separately, with the numbers each one returned and the disagreements left in.
More in seo
- Make search the channel that carries the business8 unconnected
- Give away the tool that ranks for the problem6 unconnected · contested
- Generate one page for every row in your data6 unconnected
- Write the one page that deserves to rank first6 unconnected · contested
- Write about the job, not about your product6 unconnected
- Get several channels out of one piece of work5 unconnected