skip to content

← back to the plays

independence4 unconnected · 1 more author in those circles
applies to

b2b, no audience needed

assumes a product under $20

outcome not stated

confidence

high

evidence

7 claims · 6 articles · 4 receipts

window

2016-10-282026-05-21

4 builders who never spoke to each other

Enter underneath incumbents priced for bigger firms

Categories where every option opens above a hundred dollars a month leave a whole segment unserved, and that gap is a position rather than a discount. Check whether the rival's price is explained by their costs: when it is not, the same job can ship at a fraction of it. The rule of thumb is that the advantage has to be obvious before anyone reaches your page, which means several times cheaper or several times better, not a quarter better.


The method

  1. 01

    Look for a market where every existing option is priced for larger companies and enter underneath them at indie-friendly pricing.

  2. 02

    Look for a big market crowded with expensive incumbents where there is already visible appetite for a cheaper option, and position yourself as that cheaper option.

  3. 03

    Check whether the incumbents are simply too expensive for a whole segment, then win by delivering comparable value at a price that segment can afford.

  4. 04

    Look at what a competitor charges and ask whether their price is explained by their costs; if it is not, ship the same thing at a fraction of the price.

  5. 05

    Look for a pricing gap at either end of your category: a cheaper package for small customers, or a more expensive heavily tailored one for big ones.


What it returned

  • $120

    Zue found the AI translation tools he researched started around $120 a month on their cheapest tier and wondered whether an affordable version had room.

  • Three of his questions run together here: is the market large with heavy competition above you, is there proven demand lower down, and is the market still growing.

  • One prompt asks directly whether prospects cannot afford the existing tools, and whether a cheaper build could carry the same value to a wider group.

  • The test used was a rival charging above fifty dollars a month, versus building the equivalent and selling it at roughly ten dollars a month.


Sources


the second source

Three plays a week, for the phase you are in

No roundup of links, no news. Three tactics more than one builder arrived at separately, with the numbers each one returned and the disagreements left in.

One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click, and the address is used for this and nothing else.


More in pricing

all pricing plays

the second source

Three plays a week, for the phase you are in

No roundup of links, no news. Three tactics more than one builder arrived at separately, with the numbers each one returned and the disagreements left in.

963 corroborated plays to draw from · 3 a week

One email a week. Unsubscribe in one click, and the address is used for this and nothing else.